legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rodriguez
Anthony Rodriguez appeals from the judgment entered after a plea of no contest to unlawful firearm activity. (Former Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (e).)[1] He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess), and that the calculation of his presentence conduct credits under former section 4019 violated his right to equal protection of the law. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale