P. v. Rodriguez
Anthony Rodriguez appeals from the judgment entered after a plea of no contest to unlawful firearm activity. (Former Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (e).)[1] He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess), and that the calculation of his presentence conduct credits under former section 4019 violated his right to equal protection of the law. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Rodriguez