Redln Enterprises v. City of San Diego
Appellants Redln Enterprises, Inc. and Daniel Kullberg, the president and majority shareholder of Redln (collectively Redln), appeal the successful demurrer of respondents City of San Diego (City) and William Zounes, a development project manager of the City (Zounes), to Redln's second amended complaint (SAC). Redln contends the court erred when it found the SAC did not state facts sufficient to support claims for inverse condemnation or takings (first cause of action) and for violation of civil rights pursuant to title 42 United States Code section 1983 (section 1983) for regulatory taking (second cause of action).[1] Redln also contends the court abused its discretion by not granting Redln leave to amend the SAC to state a new cause of action for selective enforcement. Affirmed.
Comments on Redln Enterprises v. City of San Diego