legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.C.
In this dependency matter, the minor, L.C., was adjudged a dependent child of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subd. (b)) and her mother’s boyfriend, J.M., whom L.C. knew as “daddy,” was found to be her presumptive father (Fam. Code, § 7611, subd. (d)).[1] The juvenile court later vacated its finding of presumed fatherhood, concluding that a 2009 paternity judgment in favor of R.C. conclusively rebutted the presumption that J.M. was the father. J.M. appeals. L.C. joins his argument on appeal. We shall affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale