legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Maynard
Appellant Mark T. Maynard and respondent Julia S. Maynard were married for over 20 years and had two children.[1] In 2008, the parties separated and Julia filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. At issue in the present appeal is the trial court’s May 28, 2010 “Order After Trial On Real Estate Issues,” which divided five pieces of real property acquired by the parties during their marriage, ruled on the valuation of the properties and the parties’ reimbursement claims, and ordered Mark to pay Julia “a net equalizing payment of $127,126.00, payable upon completion of the division of the parties’ remaining property.”
We understand Mark to contend that the May 28, 2010 order should be reversed because the trial court erred in its rulings on property valuation and the reimbursement claims. We also understand Mark to seek review of two additional trial court rulings: the May 15, 2009 denial of his request for accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; ADA) and the February 3, 2010 order awarding discovery sanctions against him in the amount of $5,000.
For the reasons stated below, we determine that the orders are either nonappealable or not immediately appealable. We will therefore dismiss the appeal without reaching the merits. We will also deny Julia’s motion for sanctions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale