legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.C.
Mother appeals from an order terminating parental rights to her two sons, G.C. (born in 2006) and J.C. (born in 2008). Mother contends the juvenile court erred in rejecting the beneficial parent relationship exception to adoption under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i).[1] Mother also asserts that the juvenile court violated her substantive due process rights and right to equal protection by refusing to allow her sons to visit her while locally incarcerated. Mother further contends she was deprived of competent representation because her trial attorney did not request in-custody visitation or object to the custody orders.[2] Without filing a separate appellate brief, father joins in and adopts mother’s contentions on appeal to the extent mother’s arguments benefit his interests. We reject mother’s contentions and father’s joinder, and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale