In re B.D.
The juvenile court terminated the parental rights of defendant and appellant R.D. (Father) regarding his son, B.D., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 366.26. On appeal, Father contends: (1) the trial court abdicated its authority under section 366.26, subdivision (n), when it failed to make a decision on B.D’s removal from the paternal grandparents’ home; (2) the relative placement preference in section 361.3 was violated; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to apply the sibling relationship exception. We reject these contentions and affirm.
Comments on In re B.D.