P. v. O’Neal
Glenn David O’Neal, defendant and appellant (defendant), appeals from the judgment entered when the trial court sentenced him to serve a term of 17 years eight months in state prison after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459),[1] and the trial court found true various alleged sentence enhancements.
Defendant contends in this appeal that the trial court violated the due process and double jeopardy clauses in the California Constitution because defendant successfully appealed his first conviction, and the trial court punished defendant more harshly on remand by sentencing him to serve 17 years eight months in prison and by imposing larger restitution and parole revocation fines. Defendant also contends the trial court committed prejudicial error when it denied his request at sentencing to have counsel reappointed to represent him at that hearing.
Comments on P. v. O’Neal