P. v. Joachim
Duane Joachim (Joachim) appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty on two counts of receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).)[1] He contends: the trial court erred in admitting his prior conviction for receiving stolen property under Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b); and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct when he asserted in closing argument that the van Joachim was driving was “littered with†or full of stolen property, and by suggesting that Joachim was the one who not only possessed the stolen property, but stole it. We will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Joachim