legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Marriage of Fry
In this marital dissolution action, appellant William R. Fry (Randy) challenges the trial court’s July 18, 2011 order directing him to pay temporary spousal support arrearages to respondent Laurie E. Fry (Laurie)[1] for the period of 2004 through 2008. Randy contends that the trial court erred in (1) awarding temporary spousal support in an amount that exceeds Laurie’s needs; (2) ordering that interest on the award of temporary spousal support run from December 31, 2008; and (3) awarding Laurie sanctions in the amount of $5,000 under Family Code section 271.[2] For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and therefore we will affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale