P. v. Morales
Defendant and appellant Jaime Saul Morales appeals after a jury convicted him of several sex offenses committed against a minor. He raises the single contention that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences on two of the counts, because there is no way to determine whether the offenses occurred on “separate occasions,†within the meaning of former Penal Code section 667.6, subdivision (d). We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Morales