P. v. Kundrat
Kade Kundrat appeals a judgment following his jury conviction of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)).[1] On appeal, he contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's findings that: (1) he acted with an intent to kill; (2) he acted with premeditation and deliberation; (3) he did not act in a heat of passion or sudden quarrel; and (4) he did not act in actual, but unreasonable, self-defense (i.e., imperfect self-defense).
Comments on P. v. Kundrat