In re M.G.
Appellants Michelle S. (Mother) and Pedro G. (Father) appeal from the dependency court’s denial of their petitions for modification (Welfare and Institutions Code section 388)[1] and from the order terminating their parental rights to their son M.G. (now age eight) and their daughter L.G. (now age seven). They contend the court abused its discretion in denying their section 388 petitions. They also contend their parental rights should not have been terminated because they visited regularly and the children would benefit from continuing the family relationship. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Mother contends that the court failed to apply the sibling benefit exception to the statutory preference for adoption. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v).) We find no error in any of the court’s orders and affirm.
Comments on In re M.G.