legal news


Register | Forgot Password

May v. Bank of America
Appellants Donna May and Shellie May appeal from a judgment of dismissal in favor of Bank of America (BofA) after the trial court sustained BofA’s demurrer without leave to amend. Appellants accused BofA of negligence after they were defrauded in a real estate scheme.
We affirm. BofA owed no duty of care to appellants, who were not BofA customers. The special circumstances that might create a duty of care are not present here. The trial court properly sustained BofA’s demurrer and dismissed it from the case.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale