legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Serna

A jury found defendant Rodney Serna guilty of violating Penal Code[1] section 288, subdivision (c)(1) (section 288(c)(1)) for committing lewd acts on a 15-year-old girl.[2] Based on five charges under section 288(c)(1), along with two additional charges not at issue here, the trial court sentenced defendant to five years in prison.
On appeal, defendant contends the judgment must be reversed because “[t]he trial court erred prejudicially by failing to give a mistake of fact instruction as to [the] age of the victim.” We conclude that mistake of fact as to the age of the victim is not a defense to a section 288(c)(1) charge and, accordingly, the trial court’s refusal to give such an instruction was not error. Therefore, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale