Marriage of Stupansky
This appeal arises from the dissolution of marriage of Victor Stupansky (Victor) and Sandra Monette (Sandra). Both parties challenge the trial court’s judgment regarding the division of property.
In part I, we discuss Victor’s appellate contentions. He argues the trial court erred in finding that his Petaluma residence was transmuted from separate property to community property, and in determining that Sandra was only required to reimburse the community $51,612.50 for the funds Sandra applied to her separate property duplex in Santa Rosa.
In part II, we discuss Sandra’s contentions in her cross-appeal. She asserts the trial court erred in failing to order Victor to return all the money he withdrew from a community certificate of deposit and deposited into his separate account, and in excluding evidence concerning Victor’s misappropriation of community funds.
As we will explain, given the limited appellate record in this judgment roll appeal, the parties did not meet their appellate burden to demonstrate reversible trial court error. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on Marriage of Stupansky