In re M.M.
S.V. (mother) appeals a dispositional order removing three-year-old M.M. from her care. Mother contends the order must be reversed because there was no evidence the child was at risk of harm in mother’s care and there were less restrictive alternatives to removal. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361.5.)[1] We reject mother’s arguments and affirm the order under review.
Comments on In re M.M.