legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cato
A jury convicted defendant Michelle Cato of one count of second degree murder in violation of Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a)[1] (count 1) and one count of attempted murder in violation of sections 664 and 187, subdivision (a) (count 2). The jury found that in the commission of count 1, defendant personally used a firearm, personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, and personally and intentionally discharged a firearm causing death within the meaning of section 12022.53, subdivisions (b), (c), and (d). In count 2, the jury found the firearm allegation pursuant to section 12022.53, subdivision (b) true, but found the allegations pursuant to section 12022.53, subdivisions (c) and (d) not true.
The trial court sentenced defendant to a total term of 57 years to life in state prison. In count 1, the court imposed a 15-years-to-life term, plus 25 years to life pursuant to section 12022.53, subdivision (d). In count 2, the court imposed a consecutive seven-year term, plus 10 years pursuant to section 12022.53, subdivision (b).
Defendant appeals on the grounds that: (1) the trial court prejudicially erred by improperly restricting her proffered psychiatric expert testimony in support of her claim of imperfect self-defense; and (2) the trial court prejudicially erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offenses of voluntary manslaughter and attempted voluntary manslaughter based on sudden quarrel.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale