P. v. Benites
Vicente Benites appeals from a judgment convicting him of voluntary manslaughter. He argues the judgment must be reversed due to the cumulative effect of error that occurred in closing argument by the prosecutor, the court's response to a jury question, and the court's refusal to exclude a rebuttal witness's testimony. We reject these contentions of error, and hence find no cumulative error.
Comments on P. v. Benites