M.V. v. Superior Court
Petitioner M.V. (mother) challenges the decision of the juvenile court to terminate reunification services and set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] to consider a permanent plan for her minor son. Mother argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it found that the reunification services offered to her were reasonable and, also, that return of the minor would create a substantial risk of detriment to him. For the reasons explained post, we disagree with these contentions and, therefore, deny the petition.
Comments on M.V. v. Superior Court