legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sharp v. Paul
Respondent Preston Sharp lived in a house owned by appellant Deborah Paul. He lived rent free with the understanding he would oversee substantial repairs to the residence. When Paul no longer wanted Sharp’s services, she asked him to move out of the residence.
As a result of conduct not relevant to the current appeal, Paul successfully sought a restraining order against Sharp. Sharp simultaneously successfully sought a restraining order against Paul. On appeal, Paul challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the restraining order entered against her. Because we conclude the restraining order is not supported by substantial evidence, we reverse and dissolve it.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale