P. v. Zeisler
Appellant Daniel Zeisler[1] received probationary sentences in two separate felony cases, each charging possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). He was subsequently found in violation of the terms of his probation, following a contested evidentiary hearing, and sentenced to a two-year term in the county jail, pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision(h)(5)(A).
Assigned counsel has submitted a Wende[2] brief, certifying that counsel has been unable to identify any issues for appellate review. Counsel also has submitted a declaration confirming that Zeisler has been advised of his right to personally file a supplemental brief raising any points which he wishes to call to the court’s attention. No supplemental brief has been submitted. As required, we have independently reviewed the record. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109–110.)
We find no arguable issues and therefore affirm.
Comments on P. v. Zeisler