P. v. Oropeza
We appointed counsel to represent Octavio Oropeza on appeal. Counsel filed a brief that set forth the facts of the case. Counsel did not argue against his client but advised the court no issues were found to argue on his behalf. Oropeza was given
30 days to file written argument on his own behalf. That period has passed, and we have received no communication from him.
Counsel did not provide this court with any specific information to assist us with our independent review pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. We have reviewed the information provided by counsel and have independently examined the record. We found no arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Oropeza