legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Guzman
Defendant Jesus Guzman was found guilty of assault with intent to commit sexual offense; rape, as charged in count one of the information. The court conducted a trial on the prior allegation, and found the prior to be true. The court sentenced defendant to seven years in state prison.
In his appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing performed by nontestifying analysts. Alternatively he argues that, in the event this court concludes defense counsel failed to preserve his confrontation issue, then he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He further contends the trial court erred in imposing a one-year enhancement due to his failure to remain free from custody for five years prior to committing this crime. We are not persuaded by any of defendant’s arguments and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale