City of Piedmont v. Harris & Assoc.
The trial court denied a petition to compel arbitration of an action brought by respondent City of Piedmont (Piedmont) against appellant Harris & Associates (Harris), in part because of the risk that arbitration of their dispute might result in conflicting rulings affecting an action arising out of the same transaction between the city and respondent Robert Gray & Associates (Gray). Harris appeals, contending inter alia that the trial court had insufficient evidence of third party common issues to warrant denial of his petition to compel arbitration. (Code Civ. Proc.,[1] § 1281.2, subd. (c), pars. 1, 4 (section 1281.2(c)).) We affirm the trial court’s order.
Comments on City of Piedmont v. Harris & Assoc.