Marriage of Shorr
Renee M. Bazar (formerly Shorr) appeals from the judgment entered by the superior court following trial of the property issues remaining after the June 2008 status-only dissolution of her marriage to Alan Shorr. Renee[1] contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in ordering her to reimburse Alan for the cost of her health insurance after April 2010 and in finding she had breached her fiduciary duty to Alan by failing to consent in 2008 to a sale of their community interest in Alan’s investment company that subsequently failed in the economic downturn. In addition, Renee contends the court abused its discretion by failing to order Alan to produce further documents relating to the parties’ assets and Alan’s income and by refusing to continue the trial to allow Renee more time to ensure Alan was not hiding community assets. We affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Shorr