Marriage of Taylor
Representing herself, as she did during much of the dissolution proceedings in the trial court, Rugenia F. Taylor appeals from the judgment entered after the court struck her response to Clarance Taylor’s petition for dissolution and entered her default. Rugenia[1] contends the court abused its discretion in imposing terminating sanctions, failing to postpone the trial after being advised of her mental health problems and continuing to exercise jurisdiction after the case had been removed to federal court. We affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Taylor