E.M. v. Super Ct.
E.M. (Mother) challenges dispositional orders entered November 27, 2011, in which the juvenile court set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] to select a permanent plan for R.F. (born December 2011). Mother claims the court erroneously denied her reunification services pursuant to section 361.5, subdivision (b)(5) and (b)(6), and failed to comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).[2] We deny the petition.
Comments on E.M. v. Super Ct.