Plummer v. Day | Eisenberg
Defendant Day | Eisenberg (D.E.) appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of plaintiff Mark B. Plummer against codefendant Andrew Bisom.[1] The arbitrator also found Plummer’s claims against D.E. were meritless. D.E. contends the court erred by denying D.E. costs as a prevailing party at arbitration. Because the arbitrator denied D.E.’s requested costs, the trial court properly denied D.E.’s motion to correct the arbitration award to award D.E. costs.
Comments on Plummer v. Day | Eisenberg