Three Rivers Provider Network v. Shamoun
Three Rivers Provider Network, Inc. (TRPN) appeals from the trial court's order granting a special motion to strike its lawsuit against Ronson Shamoun and the Law Office of Ronson J. Shamoun, a Professional Law Corporation (collectively, Shamoun) as a strategic lawsuit against public participation under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (commonly known as the anti-SLAPP statute).[1] As we will explain, we conclude that Shamoun did not meet his burden to establish that the claims against him arose from activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute. Accordingly, we reverse the order granting the special motion to strike.
Comments on Three Rivers Provider Network v. Shamoun