In re Adrian P.
Mario M. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his now 17-month-old daughter. He contends the court violated his right to due process by setting the permanency planning hearing without first providing him a reasonable chance to establish his paternity and fitness as a parent and that the violation of his constitutional rights was compounded by the failure of the Sonoma County Human Services Agency (the agency) to exercise due diligence in providing timely notice of the proceedings. We conclude that any potential violation of Mario’s rights was harmless and shall affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re Adrian P.