In re Daniel R.
This is the second time this court has considered an appeal in this matter. The first appeal was considered in appeal No. B226483, pertaining to Crystal A. (“Motherâ€), the mother of minor Daniel R. Mother appealed from the dispositional order of the juvenile court denying Mother reunification services pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 361.5, subdivisions (b)(10) and (b)(11). The juvenile court’s findings were grounded on failure to reunify with Daniel R.’s siblings and Mother had not made a reasonable effort to address her drug problems that led to the removal of those children, leading the juvenile court to conclude that Mother’s parental rights should be terminated. Mother had argued the juvenile court’s dispositional order was not supported by substantial evidence. Mother asserted she had “worked to correct†her substance abuse problems. This court rejected Mother’s arguments and affirmed the order of the juvenile court in an opinion filed on June 13, 2011. Daniel R. Sr. (“Fatherâ€)[2] was not a party in appeal No. B226483. Consequently, this opinion addresses issues peculiar to Father’s appeal. We occasionally make reference to Mother’s prior appeal but only when context so requires.
Comments on In re Daniel R.
please contact me i have a case against the same social worker Karla1562@gmail.com