P. v. Zarco
Defendant and appellant Santos Gomez Zarco appeals from the revocation of probation stemming from his felony conviction for indecent exposure. (Pen. Code, § 314.)[1] Following an evidentiary hearing, he was found in violation of probation condition No. 20 and sentenced to three years in state prison. He contends that condition No. 20 is constitutionally overbroad and, in any case, there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that he willfully violated it.
We conclude that his first contention has been forfeited, and reject the second contention. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Zarco