legal news


Register | Forgot Password

S.B. v. Superior Court
Petitioners Terry (father) and S.B. (mother) seek an extraordinary writ (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452) from the juvenile court’s orders issued at a contested six-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e))[1] terminating their reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing as to their one-year-old son, T.W. Father and mother contend they did not receive reasonable reunification services. Therefore, they further contend, the juvenile court erred in terminating their reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing. We disagree and deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale