Nesbitt v. Emmanuel
Appellant Warner Emmanuel appeals from a money judgment in favor of respondent Rosina Nesbitt, individually and as trustee for the Rosina Nesbitt Trust. He contends (1) there was insufficient evidence of his finances to support the award of punitive damages; and (2) the Rosina Nesbitt Trust should not have been awarded attorney fees. We conclude the punitive damages award must be stricken on the basis of insufficient evidence, but we will sustain the award of attorney fees.
Comments on Nesbitt v. Emmanuel