Matza v. Superior Court
Petitioner Sherri Matza and real parties in interest Edward Murphy and Michael Joseph O’Donoghue were partners who jointly owned a multi-unit residential property (the Faxon property). Matza and O’Donoghue are both defendants and cross-complainants in Murphy v. Matza, San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-06-457921, which has been consolidated with other cases below. Murphy’s complaint against them sought the partition of the Faxon property and requested that the ownership percentages of each of the three partners be determined. Among her affirmative defenses, Matza asserted that she is entitled to an accounting of revenues and expenses during Murphy’s management of the property. O’Donoghue also raised affirmative defenses claiming that he is entitled to a greater share of the property because of offsets. Both Matza and O’Donoghue also filed cross-complaints seeking adjustments to Murphy’s share of the Faxon property.
Comments on Matza v. Superior Court