legal news


Register | Forgot Password

D.C. v. Superior Court

D.C., mother of E.A., who is now just over six years old, petitions under California Rules of Court, rule 8.452 to vacate an order setting a selection and implementation hearing for E.A. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 (hereafter § .26).[1] The principal issue is whether the court had sufficient evidence on which to conclude that Mother received reasonable reunification services and there was no real prospect for reunification within the statutory period. The record shows that Mother was provided years of services to address her alcohol problem and its effects on E.A. We deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale