P. v. Campos
Counsel for defendant originally filed a Wende appeal, i.e., a brief that, pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, stated the case and facts but raised no issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf. He did not do so.
After the time to receive any reply from defendant himself had expired, we reviewed the record as required by People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106. When we undertook this review, we noticed a number of questionable probation conditions and sought supplemental briefing from the parties.
We will modify certain probation conditions and, with those modifications, affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Campos