Ogundare v. Department of Indust. Relations etc.
Ayodeji A. Ogundare, individually and doing business as Pacific Engineering Company (together Pacific), filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate asking the trial court to set aside a “debarmentâ€[1] decision adopted by the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) that would have precluded Pacific from bidding or working on public works construction projects for one year. The trial court reviewed the administrative record and concluded there was no credible evidence to support a finding that Pacific violated prevailing wage laws with intent to defraud, which finding was necessary in this case for debarment to be imposed under Labor Code section 1777.1.[2] Accordingly, the trial court granted Pacific’s petition. DLSE appeals, arguing that (i) the trial court failed to apply the correct standard of review (i.e., the substantial evidence test) and (ii) there was substantial evidence in the record to support the administrative finding of intent to defraud. We agree on both points and will reverse.
Comments on Ogundare v. Department of Indust. Relations etc.