P. v. Paris
Defendant and appellant Paul Eric Paris appeals following a guilty plea, asserting that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the upper term on the principal count and that he is entitled, as a matter of equal protection, to presentence conduct credits at the two-for-two rate provided for in the current version of Penal Code section 4019.
We find no abuse of discretion, and we reject defendant’s equal protection argument.
Comments on P. v. Paris