E.H. v. Super. Ct.
E.H., also known as E.R., the out-of-state father in this dependency case (father), petitions this court for a writ of mandate to overturn the juvenile court’s order at the 18-month review denying him further reunification services. Substantial evidence supported the trial court’s decision that he was offered reasonable reunification services and that placement of his two preteen daughters with him would have been detrimental to them. Accordingly, we deny his petition.
Comments on E.H. v. Super. Ct.