P. v. Sigona
Joseph Sigona appeals from a judgment entered upon his conviction of two counts of pandering Hannah B. and Bessie R. (counts 1, 2) and one count each of pimping (count 3) and attempted pimping (count 4). Sigona contends his pandering convictions must be overturned because the trial court improperly instructed the jury. He also asserts that the pandering conviction regarding Bessie must be overturned because the trial court improperly excluded evidence. We reject his contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Sigona