Sullivan v. Sherlock
Daniel Sherlock and Jason Blaylock purchased and remodeled a home in the hills overlooking the San Fernando Valley and then resold it to Brian Sullivan. After moving in, Sullivan discovered what he contended were serious, previously undisclosed problems with the residence and sued Sherlock and Blaylock for intentional and negligent misrepresentation and concealment. The jury returned a defense verdict, finding the sellers had not misrepresented or concealed any important fact. On appeal from the judgment entered after the jury’s verdict, Sullivan argues the trial court erred in denying a special jury instruction on a seller’s statutory duty of disclosure and committed prejudicial error with several evidentiary rulings. We affirm.
Comments on Sullivan v. Sherlock