legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Perry
Scott Perry (Perry) appeals from two 2011 orders of the trial court denying his motion to set aside a stipulated order regarding spousal support and a separate motion for spousal support. Diana Chandler (Chandler), formerly Diana Perry, cross-appeals raising various issues arising from the trial court’s denial of her request for attorney fees. In addition, Chandler has moved to dismiss a portion of Perry’s appeal and has requested imposition of sanctions. For reasons to be stated, we conclude the July 8, 2010, order was an appealable order after judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(2)), that a final judgment on the issue of spousal support was entered on July 8, 2010, and that the trial court was correct in treating Perry’s subsequent motion as a request for modification of spousal support, and not as an original motion for permanent spousal support. We have determined that none of the other issues raised by the parties establish reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm all of the orders from which the parties have appealed. In addition, we deny the motion to dismiss and decline to impose sanctions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale