legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Marshall
Defendant and appellant Melinda Marshall filed a petition under Penal Code section 2966, subdivision (b),[1] challenging the Board of Prison Terms’ certification that she met all six criteria for commitment for treatment as a condition of parole under the Mentally Disordered Offender Act (MDO Act, § 2960 et seq.).[2] The trial court confirmed that the MDO criteria had been met. On appeal, defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the MDO commitment, since her underlying conviction was for attempted kidnapping (§§ 664/207), which is not an enumerated, qualifying offense under section 2962. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale