legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.S.

C.W., mother of the minors, appeals from the judgment of the juvenile court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 358, 360, 395 [undesignated statutory references that follow are to the Welfare and Institutions Code].) Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s order to bypass her services and that the juvenile court abused its discretion in failing to find that providing services would be in the best interests of the minors. She also argues that the exit orders for C.H. and J.H., granting custody to the minors’ father, Jose H. was not in the minors’ best interests. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale