In re A.S.
Karen D. (Mother) appeals from the November 9, 2011 order of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights over minor A.S. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Lance S. (Father) is not a party to this appeal. Mother contends that the parent-child relationship exception to termination of parental rights applies. We disagree because Mother failed to show that A.S. would suffer detriment from the severance of the parent-child relationship such that it would outweigh the benefits she would receive from the stability and permanence of adoption by paternal grandparents. We conclude that adoption was the appropriate permanent plan for A.S. and affirm the order of the court.
Comments on In re A.S.