Rodriguez v. Citigroup Global Markets
In the court below, respondents sued appellant for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, conversion, and unjust enrichment. Appellant filed a petition to compel arbitration of the lawsuit. The trial court denied the petition, finding that appellant did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, an agreement to arbitrate. This appeal followed.[1]
On this de novo review, we find that appellant did prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, an agreement to arbitrate between the parties. As a result, we reverse.
Comments on Rodriguez v. Citigroup Global Markets