In re Jack D.
Z.B. appeals from judgments of the superior court making true findings on the Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 300, subdivision (b), petitions filed on behalf of her 8-year-old son, Jack D., and 3-year-old daughter, Jamie S., removing the children from her custody and denying her reunification services. She contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's jurisdictional and dispositional findings and its denial of reunification services to her. We affirm the judgments.
Comments on In re Jack D.