legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.S.

The minor’s appeal is subject to the principles of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110. In accordance with Kelly, we will provide a summary of the offenses and the proceedings in the trial court.
In July 2011 law enforcement responded to a security alarm at Hamilton Elementary School. When they arrived, officers found a classroom window shattered and two people inside. As the officers approached the classroom, J.S. fled, dropping a hammer and flashlight, and shoving one of the officers. One of the officers ran after J.S. and ordered him to stop; J.S. stopped and “took a fighting stance with the officer.” The officer took out his Taser and ordered J.S. to the ground. J.S. complied. The officers inspected the classroom. The room was “ransacked,” and there was graffiti spray-painted on the walls.
J.S. was detained and charged with second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (b)(1)), possession of tools to commit vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594.2, subd. (a)), resisting a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)), and possession of burglary tools (Pen. Code, § 466). J.S. later admitted the truth of the allegations and was granted deferred entry of judgment. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 790.) J.S. was released into his mother’s custody.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale