Gracey v. Tiles, Webb, Kulla & Grant
Appellants are successors-in-interest to owners of commercial property in Beverly Hills who sought legal advice from respondents, the Law Firm of Tilles, Webb, Kulla & Grant (TWKG) and one of their individual partners, in connection with a lease of that property.[1] Appellants filed a complaint containing several causes of action against respondents with respect to a contingency fee agreement for this legal representation and respondents cross-complained.
The trial court granted summary judgment/summary adjudication in favor of respondents on the complaint and denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication on respondents’ cross-complaint. We affirm the judgment (orders granting and denying summary judgment and summary adjudication).
Comments on Gracey v. Tiles, Webb, Kulla & Grant